Following is the text of a joint statement issued by China, France, Great Britain, Russia, and the United States at the conclusion of the Fourth P5 Conference: On the
Way to the 2015 NPT Review Conference, April 18-19, in Geneva, Switzerland.
The five Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) nuclear-weapon states, or “P5,” met in Geneva on April 18-19, 2013 under the chairmanship of the Russian Federation to
build on the 2009 London, 2011 Paris, and 2012 Washington P5 conferences. The P5 reviewed progress towards fulfilling the commitments made at the 2010 NPT Review
Conference, and continued discussions on issues related to all three pillars of the NPT – non-proliferation, the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and disarmament,
including confidence-building, transparency, and verification experiences. The P5 also had a positive exchange with representatives of civil society during the Geneva
P5 Conference.
The P5 reaffirmed their commitment to the shared goal of nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament as provided for in Article VI of the NPT, and
emphasized the importance of continuing to work together in implementing the 2010 NPT Review Conference Action Plan. The P5 reviewed the outcome of the 2012
Preparatory Committee for the 2015 NPT Review Conference, and significant developments in the context of the NPT since the 2012 Washington P5 Conference. They assessed
issues relating to strategic stability and international security, and exchanged views concerning prospects for further steps to promote dialogue and mutual confidence
in this area, including in a multilateral format.
In addition, the P5 welcomed a briefing by the Russian Federation and the United States on the ongoing implementation of the New START Treaty and its success to date.
The P5 were also briefed by the Russian Federation and the United States on the joint 2012 inspection in Antarctica conducted pursuant to the Antarctic Treaty of 1959
and its Environmental Protocol. This joint inspection included verification that the international stations are implementing relevant environmental rules and that
facilities are used only for peaceful purposes. The P5 shared views on objectives for the 2013 Preparatory Committee, the intersessional period thereafter, and looked
ahead to the 2014 Preparatory Committee and 2015 Review Conference.
The P5 discussed the latest developments in the area of multilateral disarmament initiatives including the situation at the Conference on Disarmament. They expressed
their shared disappointment that the Conference on Disarmament continues to be prevented from agreeing on a comprehensive program of work, including work on a legally
binding, verifiable international ban on the production of fissile material (FMCT) for use in nuclear weapons, and discussed efforts to find a way forward in the
Conference on Disarmament, including by continuing their efforts with other relevant partners to promote such negotiations within the CD. The P5 reiterated their
support for the immediate start of negotiations on a treaty encompassing such a ban in the Conference on Disarmament. They noted the Group of Governmental Experts
(GGE) on FMCT, and expressed the hope that its work will help spur negotiations in the Conference on Disarmament. The P5 reaffirmed the historic contribution of the
pragmatic, step-by-step process to nuclear disarmament and stressed the continued validity of this proven route. In this context, they also emphasized their shared
understanding of the serious consequences of nuclear weapon use and that the P5 would continue to give the highest priority to avoiding such contingencies.
The P5 advanced their previous discussions of an approach to reporting on their relevant activities across all three pillars of the NPT Action Plan at the 2014 NPT
Preparatory Committee Meeting, consistent with the NPT Action Plan, and resolved to continue working on this issue under France’s leadership. They plan to continue
their discussions in multiple ways within the P5 with a view to reporting to the 2014 PrepCom, consistent with their commitments under Actions 5, 20, and 21 of the
2010 RevCon Final Document. They welcomed the progress made on the development of the P5 glossary of key nuclear terms under China’s leadership and discussed next
steps. They stressed the importance of this work, which will increase P5 mutual understanding and facilitate further P5 discussions on nuclear matters. The P5
reaffirmed their objective to submit a P5 glossary of key nuclear terms to the 2015 NPT Review Conference. The P5 are working toward the establishment of a firm
foundation for mutual confidence and further disarmament efforts. They shared further information on their respective bilateral and multilateral experiences in
verification and resolved to continue such exchanges.
The P5 recalled their Joint Statement of 3 May 2012 at the Preparatory Committee of the NPT Review Conference and pledged to continue their efforts in different
formats and at various international fora to find peaceful diplomatic solutions to the outstanding problems faced by the non-proliferation regime. They reiterated
their call on the states concerned to fulfill without delay their international obligations under the appropriate UN Security Council resolutions, undertakings with
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and other appropriate international commitments. In the context of the nuclear test conducted by the DPRK on 12 February
2013 and the continued pursuit of certain nuclear activities by Iran, both contrary to the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and IAEA Board of Governors
resolutions, the P5 reaffirmed their concerns about these serious challenges to the non-proliferation regime.
The P5 underlined the fundamental importance of an effective IAEA safeguards system in preventing nuclear proliferation and facilitating cooperation in the peaceful
uses of nuclear energy. The P5 stressed the need for strengthening IAEA safeguards including through the promotion of the universal adoption of the Additional Protocol
and the development of approaches to IAEA safeguards implementation based on objective state factors. They also discussed the role of the P5 in assisting the IAEA in
cases involving possible detection of nuclear weapon programs in non-nuclear weapons states (NNWS) in conformity with the provisions of the NPT.
The P5 continued their previous discussions of efforts to achieve the entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), and reviewed the recent
UK-hosted P5 Experts Meeting on CTBT, at which the P5 identified a number of areas for future P5 collaboration and decided to pursue further intersessional work, in
particular ahead of the Integrated Field Exercise in 2014. The P5 called upon all States to uphold their national moratoria on nuclear weapons-test explosions or any
other nuclear explosions, and to refrain from acts that would defeat the object and purpose of the Treaty pending its entry into force.
The P5 shared their views on how to prevent abuse of NPT withdrawal (Article X). The discussion included modalities under which NPT States Party could respond
collectively and individually to a notification of withdrawal, including through arrangements regarding the disposition of equipment and materials acquired or derived
under safeguards during NPT membership. They resolved to make efforts to broaden consensus among NPT States Party on the latter issue at the 2014 PrepCom, thus making
a further contribution to the NPT Review Process.
The P5 reiterated the importance of the implementation of the 2010 NPT Review Conference decisions related to the 1995 Resolution on the Middle East, in particular
those related to the convening of a conference to be attended by all the States of the Middle East on the establishment of the Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons
and all other weapons of mass destruction on the basis of arrangements freely arrived at by the states of the region. They underlined their support for all States
concerned, making all efforts necessary for the preparation and convening of the Conference in the nearest future. They also reiterated their full support to the
ongoing efforts of the facilitator.
The P5 reviewed their efforts to bring about the entry into force of the relevant legally binding protocols of nuclear-weapon-free zone treaties. They reaffirmed their
view that establishment of such zones helps to build confidence between nuclear and non-nuclear weapon states, enhance regional and international security, and
reinforce the NPT and the international nuclear non-proliferation regime. They reaffirmed their readiness to sign the Protocol to the Treaty on the Southeast Asia
Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone as soon as possible. They underlined the importance of holding consultations, including on the margins of the Second PrepCom, with the States
Party to the Treaty on a Nuclear Weapon-Free-Zone in Central Asia. They noted also the parallel declarations, adopted by the P5 and Mongolia concerning Mongolia’s
nuclear-weapon-free status, at the United Nations headquarters in New York on 17 September 2012.
The P5 pledged to continue to meet at all appropriate levels on nuclear issues to further promote dialogue and mutual confidence. The P5 plan to follow up their
discussions and hold a fifth P5 conference in 2014.
Pingback: spankbang bbw big boobs blonde chubby dildo cam
Pingback: Mushroom Golden Teacher
Pingback: super kaya88
Pingback: สล็อตสายบุญ แตกง่าย ได้ทั้ง เงิน ได้ทั้ง บุญ
Pingback: https://upx1688.online/
Pingback: sex trẻ em
Pingback: arduino
Pingback: swan168
Pingback: สล็อตทุนน้อย