Ethnicity and adoption: the gap between rhetoric and law and the role of racial neoliberalism

The adoption of minority ethnic children has been hugely
controversial for several decades, with debates raging on the merits of
‘transracial adoption’ on the one hand and ‘ethnic matching’ on the
other. The coalition government attempted to eliminate perceived
barriers to transracial adoption by removing the legal requirement for
adoption agencies to consider ‘ethnicity’ decisions. The justification
was that over-emphasis on ethnicity (rooted in ‘political
correctness’) was leading to delay and denial of adoption for children,
who consequently languished in the care system. However, Derek Kirton argues
the evidence for this is questionable and the removal of ethnicity from
legislation is better understood as a political move, framed by a
combination of populism and neoliberalism.

As a policy issue, adoption of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME)
children has passed through three phases. The first, covering the 1960s
and 1970s saw the rise of transracial adoption as part of initiatives
to challenge the idea that the children were ‘unadoptable’ because of
prejudiced attitudes towards them. A second phase beginning in the 1970s
and gathering momentum in the 1980s promoted the principle of racial or
ethnic matching. This was premised on the idea that families from
similar ethnic backgrounds would be best placed to meet children’s
identity needs in terms of race, ethnicity and culture and to help them
survive in a racist society. It was also argued that the apparent
‘shortage’ of BAME adoptive families reflected the ethnocentric and
sometimes discriminatory practices of adoption agencies. Preference for
ethnic matching became prevalent and was officially endorsed in
government guidance in the early 1990s. From there, however, a long
third phase began in which government issued ever sterner warnings
against over-emphasising ethnicity if this led to delay in the adoption.
The Children and Families Act 2014 can be seen as an attempt to bring
closure to this phase.

The government’s case rested on two key planks: first that BAME
children suffered from lower and slower rates of adoption and second,
that the legal requirement to consider ethnicity was an important causal
factor for this. On rates, it should be noted that this does not apply
to children classified as of Mixed backgrounds, whose headline adoption
rates at least match those of White children. However, in a fairly
consistent pattern over time, those categorised as Black or Asian are
statistically much less likely to
be adopted, with rates of 2 and 3 per cent respectively compared with 8
per cent for white British children in care in 2014-15. When figures
have been released on ethnicity and delay, this has been found to apply
only to Black children, whose adoptions took over 40 per cent longer. On the basis of these figures, it is regularly claimed by the media and government ministers that BAME children languish in care as a result.

Yet research has shown
that the rates were partly explicable by the (older) age profile of
Black children entering care. More importantly, a focus on adoptions
ignores other routes out of care, such as return to birth or extended
family or long-term foster care. Remarkably,it was also found that
children from those ethnic groups least likely to be adopted spent the shortest average time in
care. This remains an under-researched area, but certainly casts
significant doubt on simplistic assumptions of ‘languishing’. What is
interesting here is that The Children Act 1989 clearly prioritises
(where in the child’s best interests) placement within the family over
adoption, yet the lower rates of adoption for some BAME groups are held
to be self-evidently discriminatory. The second plank reflected a view
that these (s)lower rates of adoption reflected social workers, under
the spell of political correctness, pursuing perfect ethnic matches.
Evidence for this is very weak, while it is also unclear how far if at all, any such pursuit was rooted in the wording of legislation.

In a recent article,
I analysed the Parliamentary debates and passage of the Children and
Families Act as they related to ethnicity and adoption. The most
striking feature was the coalition government’s increasingly
contradictory stance on the (un)importance of ethnicity. The process
began with pre-legislative scrutiny in the House of Lords, where the
committee chaired by Baroness Butler Sloss concluded that
there was no need for legal change and made clear its opposition to
deletion of the ‘ethnicity clause’. In a compromise move, however, it
conceded that existing legislation could be seen as giving ethnicity
undue prominence and proposed moving the content of the clause into the
‘welfare checklist’ that is used to support decision making for
children.

For its part, the government held doggedly to the position that the
clause must be removed entirely from the statute book in order to
achieve the necessary degree of change. However, faced with strong and
articulate opposition, it began to assert in ever more strident tones
how much ethnicity mattered, how it must be taken fully taken into
account on every front and in all decisions relating to adoption for
BAME children. Moreover, it was in any event ‘automatically’ included as
one of the ‘other characteristics’ in the welfare checklist.

Procedurally, the growing contradiction was managed by a sharp
separation between statute (from which any reference to ethnicity must
be erased) and guidance (where its implications could seemingly be
explored copiously). Part of the explanation for this two-faced approach
almost certainly rests with a desire to deliver up a populist symbolic
victory over political correctness to the media.

Equally apparent is the influence of neoliberalism, including on
matters of race and ethnicity. In child welfare, in a climate where
austerity has impacted particularly on the poorest (and often disproportionately on
minority ethnic groups), there has been a growing emphasis on ‘child
rescue’, a willingness to remove children from their families and do so
permanently through adoption. As Goldberg has argued,
racial neoliberalism speaks to a post-race society while historic and
contemporary racism are ‘buried alive’ and victimhood is reversed. And
so in mainstream media coverage the
pervasive disinterest in BAME children and families is typically
suspended when there is white victimhood i.e. when prospective adopters
are rejected.

Racial neoliberalism’s policy influence is discernible in the
unwillingness to use the levers of government to address the needs of
BAME children other than through the privatised solution of adoption or
to recruit more BAME families. Rhetorically, government representatives positioned themselves as champions of racial equality (with flourishes on Mandela and Marin Luther King) and engaged in the ‘non-performative’ use of language, in this instance through regular disclaimers that they ‘take race seriously’ while their actions belied this.

Given the contradictory messages of law and guidance, it remains to
be seen how implementation will occur and it is entirely possible that
the long running tussle between media, politicians and adoption
practitioners will continue.

35 Comments

  • My partner and I stumbled over here from a different page and thought I should check things out.
    I like what I see so i am just following you.

    Look forward to going over your web page for a second time.

  • Howdy! This article could not be written much better!
    Looking through this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He continually kept talking about this. I will send this information to him.

    Fairly certain he’ll have a good read. Thank you
    for sharing!

  • Hello there! This post could not be written any better!
    Looking through this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He continually kept talking about this. I am going to forward this information to
    him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  • Everything published made a great deal of sense. However, think on this, what if you were to create a killer post title?
    I mean, I don’t want to tell you how to run your website,
    but what if you added a title that grabbed a person’s attention? I mean Ethnicity and adoption: the
    gap between rhetoric and law and the role of racial neoliberalism –
    Control Arms Foundation of India is kinda boring.
    You ought to glance at Yahoo’s home page and watch how they
    write news headlines to grab people interested.
    You might add a related video or a pic or two to grab readers excited about everything’ve
    written. In my opinion, it could bring your posts a little livelier.

  • 349286 713309Spot lets start function on this write-up, I actually believe this amazing website requirements additional consideration. Ill far more likely be once once again you just read additional, thank you that info. 949485

  • 180116 391763Thank you a whole lot for sharing this with all individuals you really recognize what you are speaking about! Bookmarked. Please furthermore talk more than with my web internet site =). We could have a hyperlink alternate arrangement among us! 606688

  • Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Thanks, However I am experiencing troubles with your RSS.
    I don’t know why I am unable to subscribe to it.
    Is there anyone else having the same RSS issues? Anybody who knows the answer will you kindly
    respond? Thanks!!

  • With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright
    infringement? My site has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either written myself or
    outsourced but it appears a lot of it is
    popping it up all over the internet without my permission. Do you know any
    techniques to help prevent content from being stolen?
    I’d certainly appreciate it.

  • Today, I went to the beachfront with my kids. I found a sea shell and
    gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put
    the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.

    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely
    off topic but I had to tell someone!

  • 642436 873214You may uncover two to three new levels inside L . a . Weight loss and any one someone is incredibly essential. Initial stage might be real melting away rrn the body. shed weight 916460

  • I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website.

    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a
    designer to create your theme? Excellent work!

  • I’ve been browsing online more than 4 hours
    today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good
    content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

  • hello there and thank you for your information – I have definitely picked up something new from right here.

    I did however expertise some technical issues using this web
    site, since I experienced to reload the website a lot of times previous to I could get it to load properly.
    I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I’m complaining,
    but sluggish loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and could damage your
    high-quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords.
    Well I’m adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for a lot more of your respective exciting content.

    Make sure you update this again soon.

  • I believe this is one of the most important info
    for me. And i’m glad reading your article. However want
    to observation on few basic issues, The website style is ideal, the articles
    is really great : D. Just right process, cheers

  • Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after going through many of the articles
    I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m certainly pleased I found it and I’ll be book-marking it and
    checking back regularly!

  • Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon everyday.

    It’s always useful to read through content from other writers and practice something from other websites.

  • Hey there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using
    for this site? I’m getting sick and tired of WordPress because I’ve had problems with
    hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform.
    I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a
    good platform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.